Babies in Bottles

Lured to the streets of a lay-over city,

a place foreign to my soul, a mob

of askant stares, titillated expectancy,

shrill hawking of flesh and wares,

and placards enticing, promising all;

I walked halls narrowed by sideshow trite:

latex attempts at grotesquerie, cast horrors,

a two-headed this and a five legged that,

the longest, thinnest, the nastiest things.

Quickly contrite, I sought an out-door,

but down-cast eyes led me astray into

the dim, sad light of a smaller corridor.

Each bottle hovered in its own alcove.

Suspended by and washed by, so slow,

a stainless, sterile sluice, a gentle sate,

each “malfeasant of nature” each

“quirk of fate” slept in its own forever.

Each baby was lite for affect and show:

a stunted webbed limb, a bulbous head,

a truncated body without appendage,

a Cyclops, a hermaphrodite, a Hydra;

each a double handful of sorrow for show.

By what were these unions frowned upon:

a gene glitch run rampant, toxicosis,

a gods punishment, or mans violence?

A cause cries for blame for through

the particled sate a delicate eyelid,

a perfect toe, alludes to original joy,

though fleeting, of a life proposed

but not realized or ordained, but taken.

Who or what along the blade of existence

nixed this one or that one or that?

What were their sins condemning them

to naked display with stitched scars

of exploration visible to see along

the palest of blood freed flesh?

And, where were their souls? Were they

those vague entities of phosphorescent

sheen locked in jars;…..fireflies

snatched from night’s vitrine, stuffed

beneath blankets in trunks in darken rooms?

The phrases, “malfesasant of nature” and “quirk of fate” were taken from a poem by Robert Penn Warren.  I can not locate my copy of his collected works to give the poems title.  The origin of the idea is somewhat vague in my memory, but I believe it came from reading somewhere, several years ago, that some museum or commercial enterprise had put on a public display of deformed fetuses for whatever reason I can’t remember.  Needless to say, this bit of information affected me profoundly as I have worked on this poem over several years.  It is time to let it go.

Comments

8 responses to “Babies in Bottles”

  1. Laurie Kolp Avatar
    Laurie Kolp

    This is so beautifully written, Leo. I absolutely love the first stanza and I think the ending is very thought-provoking.

    1. Leo Avatar

      Thank you, Laurie. And in case you read the comments above about the final stanza….I did delete that…miss shrewdbanana earned her title; she was right!
      Happy writing!

  2. Susan L Daniels Avatar

    Leo–I love this. Your craft shows an amazing depth. Going to have to follow anything from your pen!

    1. Leo Avatar

      Thank you, Susan, so much! Looking forward to your work, too,

  3. shrewdbanana Avatar
    shrewdbanana

    This is absolutely stunning poetry, Leo. It is deeply moving and the words you’ve chosen are both chilling and beautifully expressive – that line ‘slept in its own forever’ will haunt me. It leapt off the page in its simple truth.

    I have a slight problem incorporating the final stanza with the rest of the poem; it seems too abrupt a change of scene for me. From the streets and sideshows to a sandy cove – I wondered how we’d arrived there.

    But please don’t think I’m being over-critical – just puzzled, and it doesn’t diminish my appreciation of the main body of the poem at all.
    I am certain sure you could find a publisher for such wonderful work.

    1. Leo Avatar

      Thank You so much, Anne. I value your opionion. I realize there is a stark contrast between the final stanza and the rest of the poem; this was my intent. Whether it works or not, I also, had my doubts. I may have to ease into the last part a little more slowly, but I do want to keep it. To me, an animal rotting in the woods, returning to where it came, seems a blessing, almost spiritual, compared to how humans treat and exploit their own kind. Thank you, again!

      1. shrewdbanana Avatar
        shrewdbanana

        Just so you know – I think I ‘got’ what you were doing with the final stanza here, but I still feel that the integrity of the poem works better without it.

        It’s not the leap from suburbs to coast so much, it’s more that the initial images were so strong in my head, I find that the deer competed too much with them, left them nowhere to ‘settle’.
        And because that image of the deer is so powerful in and by itself, I think it would work easily in a poem of its own. (And by the way, this is really odd, Leo, because I use the exact same image of a dead deer in my novella ‘Pale Shelter’ too.)

        Just to stress, this is only my opinion, so please do feel free to stick to your guns. I hope you don’t mind me looking at it in such detail. I would not take the time if it hadn’t affected me this strongly – so thank you again for sharing it.

      2. Leo Avatar

        Anne, You are very perceptive. The final stanza was, if memory serves, in the beginning a seperate poem! This is why me need feedback, right! You are very convincing. Thanks, again. Leo

Love to have a comment!